Personhood Oklahoma organization is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn an Oklahoma state court ruling that struck a personhood referendum from the state's ballot. |
The Life Legal Defense Foundation
(LLDF) is urging the United States Supreme Court to review a decision
of the Oklahoma Supreme Court striking a ballot initiative that would
amend the Oklahoma Constitution to define "person" as "any human being
from the beginning of the biological development of that human being to
natural death." In a friend of the court brief filed last week, the LLDF
told the Court that the Oklahoma court ruling conflicted with prior
Supreme Court precedent and should be reversed.
Earlier this year, Personhood Oklahoma began the process of collecting signatures to place Initiative Petition 395 on the ballot. Pro-abortion individuals, backed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, filed a protest with the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, claiming that IP 395 was unconstitutional and should not be permitted to be placed on the ballot.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court agreed, holding that, on its face, IP 395 conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, affirming the right of women to obtain abortions without "undue burden" from state laws. The court preemptively found the law unconstitutional and ordered that the petition be stricken.
Earlier this year, Personhood Oklahoma began the process of collecting signatures to place Initiative Petition 395 on the ballot. Pro-abortion individuals, backed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, filed a protest with the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, claiming that IP 395 was unconstitutional and should not be permitted to be placed on the ballot.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court agreed, holding that, on its face, IP 395 conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, affirming the right of women to obtain abortions without "undue burden" from state laws. The court preemptively found the law unconstitutional and ordered that the petition be stricken.
"If the United States Supreme Court does not affirm the right of the people to engage in the initiative process, the people's power will diminish, and we'll be stuck with activist judges," said Dana Cody, Executive Director of the Life Legal Defense Foundation. "This isn't just an Oklahoma issue; it is a threat to political freedom in any state."
No comments:
Post a Comment